AFTERNOON UPDATE In Damage-Control Effort, Senator Assembles Veteran D.C. Legal TeamSenator Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) is seeking help in Washington as he faces allegations about personal improprieties, assembling a damage-control team that includes at least two lawyers and a consultant who served as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr.'s top spokesman. Judge Denies New Trial in Armenian Genocide Museum DisputeMore than a decade after efforts began to build a museum memorializing the mass slaughter of Armenians during World War I, litigation over the failure of those efforts has consumed everyone involved. Yesterday, a Washington federal judge denied a motion for a new trial in the dispute and ordered the plaintiffs to pay the defendants $1.4 million in fees and costs.
Supreme Court Ruling Jeopardizes Encyclopedia Group's Legal Malpractice LawsuitSeveral months after losing a motion for summary judgment, Encyclopaedia Britannica is facing another possible setback in its legal malpractice lawsuit against Dickstein Shapiro.
Law Firm Leaders Q&A: Duane Morris' Douglas WoloshinDouglas Woloshin has seen Washington change in the nearly 35 years he's been practicing law. His longevity in the D.C. legal market made him a logical fit as the managing partner of Duane Morris' Washington office, a post he has held since 2004. He is also a member of the firm's partner board and head of the project finance practice group. SUPREME COURTHenderson v. United StatesError is "plain" within meaning of F.R.Crim.P. 52(b) if it is plain at time of appellate review, whether or not legal question was settled at time of trial (Breyer, J.) Evans v. MichiganUnder well-established precedent, state trial court's directed acquittal precluded retrial, even though court's ruling was based on legally mistaken reasoning (Sotomayor, J.) Gunn v. MintonFederal statute providing for exclusive jurisdiction of cases arising under patent law did not deprive state court of jurisdiction over legal malpractice claim in patent case (Roberts, C.J.) Johnson v. WilliamsFederal habeas petitioner's claim must be presumed adjudicated on merits, subject to rebuttal, where state court has rejected some of petitioner's claims but has not directly addressed any federal claims (Alito, J.) Chaidez v. United StatesRecent Supreme Court decision holding that defense attorneys must advise non-citizen clients of deportation risks of guilty pleas does not apply to cases already final on direct review (Kagan, J.) | Get the BLT on your iPhone or iPod Touch. Available now in the App Store. If you have Twitter account, you can now follow NLJ Editor in Chief David L. Brown at twitter.com/davidlbrownjr. Follow him for links to key stories and updates from the NLJ newsroom. You can also track news on Twitter from the NLJ's Washington bureau at twitter.com/legal_times. | |||||||
MOST POPULAR STORIES
|
Please do not reply to the address you received this email from. Manage your email communications below. Why you received this email message: You are subscribed to the NLJ.com -Legal Times Afternoon Update as reg.thakur@gmail.com. You may be subscribed to multiple publications as part of your relationship with us. To manage or change any information in your account, please click here to log in and click on the My Account tab in the navigation bar. To stop receiving this publication (unsubscribe): To stop receiving the NLJ.com -Legal Times Afternoon Update, please click here. You will be taken through an unsubscribe process. Please follow all directions regarding this process. It may take 10-days to remove you from receiving this publication. Note: If you are subscribed to multiple publications, per your subscription, you will need to unsubscribe from each publication you receive utilizing the email management area at the bottom of each publication. To not receive or opt-out of email marketing promotions from the National Law Journal: Please click here to opt-out of receiving email marketing promotions from the National Law Journal. This will only prevent you from receiving email marketing promotions from the National Law Journal; you will continue receiving the publications as noted above unless you unsubscribe from each one. It may take up to 10-days to remove you from receiving email marketing promotions. How to contact us should you have questions: The National Law Journal® | |||||
|
No comments:
Post a Comment