Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Williams & Connolly Facing Disqualification Motion

NEwS FROM WASHINGTON

• Williams & Connolly Facing Disqualification Motion

• D.C. Circuit: Jerusalem Passport Law Invades Executive Turf

• Justice Dept. Told Not to Delay Aaron Swartz FOIA

• Import of Lethal Injection Drug Blocked by D.C. Circuit

• FTC Vows Strong Action After Pay-for-Delay Ruling

• Regulators and Banks Met Hundreds of Times About Dodd-Frank

Williams & Connolly Facing Disqualification Motion

Williams & Connolly faces a motion to disqualify the firm from a civil lawsuit in Washington federal court involving the son of partner Brendan Sullivan Jr. The firm represents Brendan Sullivan III against Sullivan's former business partner, Robert Elwood. Late... Read More »

D.C. Circuit: Jerusalem Passport Law Invades Executive Turf

A federal appeals court in Washington has declared unconstitutional the federal law that allowed Americans born in Jerusalem to identify "Israel" as their place of birth on a U.S. passport. Read More »

Justice Dept. Told Not to Delay Aaron Swartz FOIA

A federal trial judge in Washington today urged the government to continue reviewing thousands of pages of documents that could be released in a public records lawsuit seeking information from the Secret Service about the Internet activist Aaron Swartz. The... Read More »

Import of Lethal Injection Drug Blocked by D.C. Circuit

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration was wrong to allow states to import a "misbranded and unapproved new drug" used in lethal injection cocktails without first examining it, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled today. In... Read More »

FTC Vows Strong Action After Pay-for-Delay Ruling

The Federal Trade Commission is planning strong court attacks against so-called "pay-for-delay" generic drug settlements in response to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June, commission Chairwoman Edith Ramirez told a Senate committee Tuesday on Capitol Hill. The high court's... Read More »

Regulators and Banks Met Hundreds of Times About Dodd-Frank

Representatives of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Morgan Stanley & Co. are taking up the most space in the calendars of federal regulators tasked with implementing the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, according... Read More »

SUPREME COURT CASES

United States v. Windsor

Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional as deprivation of equal liberty of persons that is protected by Fifth Amendment (Kennedy, J.) Read More »

Sekhar v. United States

Attempt to compel person to recommend his employer approve investment did not constitute "obtaining of property from another" for purposes of Hobbs Act definition of extortion (Scalia, J.) Read More »

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Proponents of California same-sex marriage law initiative lacked standing to appeal federal district court's disapproval after California governor and state and local officials refused to defend challenged law (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder

Provision in 1965 Voting Rights Act determining which states must receive federal preclearance based on past history of discrimination in voting is outdated and unconstitutional (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a claim of retaliatory adverse employment action requires proof of but-for causation, not merely proof that improper motive was one of multiple causes of the challenged employment action. (U.S. Supreme Court, 06-24-2013) Read More »

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Biological father who had never had custody of child could not rely on Indian Child Welfare Act to obtain custody after birth mother agreed to adoption of child by non-Indian adoptive couple (Alito, J.) Read More »



Careers
Position title EMPLOYER NAME LOCATION

Immigration Attorney - RALEIGH (737)

American Legal Search

Raleigh, North Carolina

Creditors' Rights / Banking Litigation Associate

Atticus Recruiting Inc.

Chicago, Illinois

Sr. Attorney

Confidential

White Plains, New York

POWERED BY lawjobs.com

Email Management Area

Please do not reply to the address you received this email from. Manage your email communications below.

Why you received this email message:

You are subscribed to the
NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update as reg.thakur@gmail.com.

You may be subscribed to multiple publications as part of your relationship with us.

To stop receiving this publication (unsubscribe):

To stop receiving the NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update please click here.You will be taken through an unsubscribe process. Please follow all directions regarding this process.
It may take 10-days to remove you from receiving this publication.

Note: If you are subscribed to multiple publications, per your subscription, you will need to unsubscribe from each publication you receive utilizing the email management area at the bottom of each publication.

To not receive or opt-out of email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®:

Please click here to opt-out of receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®. This will only prevent you from receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®; you will continue receiving the publications as noted above unless you unsubscribe from each one. It may take up to 10-days to remove you from receiving email marketing promotions.

How to contact us should you have questions:

The National Law Journal®
120 Broadway, 5th Floor,
New York, NY 10271-1101
Customer Service Phone: 1-877-256-2472

About ALM | Customer Support | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
   © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC.
All rights reserved.
 fb  tw

No comments:

Post a Comment