Wednesday, July 24, 2013

D.C. Circuit Nominee Under Fire on Capitol Hill

NEwS FROM WASHINGTON

• D.C. Circuit Nominee Under Fire on Capitol Hill

• Bank of America Challenges FDIC 'No Value' Decision

• Chamber of Commerce Spent $19M on Lobbying in Q2

• Former Senior DOJ Lawyer Heads to Akin

• No Extra Discipline for Prosecutor Who Withheld Evidence

• First Circuit Divides Over Malodorous Case

D.C. Circuit Nominee Under Fire on Capitol Hill

Republican senators grilled Cornelia "Nina" Pillard about her views on hot-button political issues during her confirmation hearing Wednesday, setting her up to be the most controversial of the three nominees for the U.S. Court of Appeals to the D.C. Circuit.... Read More »

Bank of America Challenges FDIC 'No Value' Decision

Bank of America, N.A. is challenging the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's authority to knock out certain court claims against financial institutions under receivership by issuing a determination that they have "no value." The lawsuit, filed July 22 in U.S. District... Read More »

Chamber of Commerce Spent $19M on Lobbying in Q2

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its affiliated organizations doled out about $19.1 million on advocacy efforts during the past three months, spending roughly $2.3 million more than it did in the previous quarter, according to second-quarter lobbying reports filed... Read More »

Former Senior DOJ Lawyer Heads to Akin

Updated 2:39 p.m. A former senior U.S. Justice Department attorney who advised top officials on matters that included the Fast and Furious congressional investigation and the inquiry into Aaron Swartz's death is joining Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Steven... Read More »

No Extra Discipline for Prosecutor Who Withheld Evidence

A federal appeals court has opted to stay out of a dispute over whether a Boston federal prosecutor committed a professional breach by withholding exculpatory evidence in a racketeering trial. Read More »

First Circuit Divides Over Malodorous Case

A divided federal appeals court in Boston upheld a man's conviction for misdemeanor property damage for his soiling of a small, single-occupant courthouse restroom in Portland, Maine. It was no accident, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled. Read More »

SUPREME COURT CASES

United States v. Windsor

Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional as deprivation of equal liberty of persons that is protected by Fifth Amendment (Kennedy, J.) Read More »

Sekhar v. United States

Attempt to compel person to recommend his employer approve investment did not constitute "obtaining of property from another" for purposes of Hobbs Act definition of extortion (Scalia, J.) Read More »

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Proponents of California same-sex marriage law initiative lacked standing to appeal federal district court's disapproval after California governor and state and local officials refused to defend challenged law (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder

Provision in 1965 Voting Rights Act determining which states must receive federal preclearance based on past history of discrimination in voting is outdated and unconstitutional (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a claim of retaliatory adverse employment action requires proof of but-for causation, not merely proof that improper motive was one of multiple causes of the challenged employment action. (U.S. Supreme Court, 06-24-2013) Read More »

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Biological father who had never had custody of child could not rely on Indian Child Welfare Act to obtain custody after birth mother agreed to adoption of child by non-Indian adoptive couple (Alito, J.) Read More »



Careers
Position title EMPLOYER NAME LOCATION

Attorney Recruiter

JuriSolutions, Inc

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

LITIGATION ASSOCIATE

CHIMES, LEWIS, LLC

Stamford, CT

ASSOCIATE/IP/PATENT/BIO

New England Legal Search

Boston, MA

POWERED BY lawjobs.com

Email Management Area

Please do not reply to the address you received this email from. Manage your email communications below.

Why you received this email message:

You are subscribed to the
NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update as reg.thakur@gmail.com.

You may be subscribed to multiple publications as part of your relationship with us.

To stop receiving this publication (unsubscribe):

To stop receiving the NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update please click here.You will be taken through an unsubscribe process. Please follow all directions regarding this process.
It may take 10-days to remove you from receiving this publication.

Note: If you are subscribed to multiple publications, per your subscription, you will need to unsubscribe from each publication you receive utilizing the email management area at the bottom of each publication.

To not receive or opt-out of email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®:

Please click here to opt-out of receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®. This will only prevent you from receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®; you will continue receiving the publications as noted above unless you unsubscribe from each one. It may take up to 10-days to remove you from receiving email marketing promotions.

How to contact us should you have questions:

The National Law Journal®
120 Broadway, 5th Floor,
New York, NY 10271-1101
Customer Service Phone: 1-877-256-2472

About ALM | Customer Support | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
   © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC.
All rights reserved.
 fb  tw

No comments:

Post a Comment