Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Court Vacates SEC Payment Disclosure Rule

NEwS FROM WASHINGTON

• Court Vacates SEC Payment Disclosure Rule

• Patton Boggs Ends Lobbying for Ecuador

• Barry Diller to Pay $480K to Settle Antitrust Claims

• Judge Dismisses Suit Filed by Supreme Court "Occupy" Protester

• Sentencing for Jesse Jackson Jr. Postponed

• Death Penalty Protesters Fasting at Supreme Court

Court Vacates SEC Payment Disclosure Rule

A controversial rule by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that would require oil and gas extraction companies to disclose government payments was vacated today by a Washington federal judge. The agency "fundamentally miscalculated the scope of its discretion" and... Read More »

Patton Boggs Ends Lobbying for Ecuador

As Patton Boggs looks to rebound from a poor financial showing in 2012, the Washington-based law firm will have to make do without $780,000 annually from Ecuador. The firm has stopped lobbying for the country, according to a Foreign Agents... Read More »

Barry Diller to Pay $480K to Settle Antitrust Claims

Corporate investor Barry Diller has agreed to pay $480,000 to settle claims he violated federal antitrust law when he acquired hundreds of thousands of shares of The Coca Cola Company between 2010 and 2012. Diller, a billionaire media mogul known... Read More »

Judge Dismisses Suit Filed by Supreme Court "Occupy" Protester

A D.C. federal judge on Tuesday dismissed a complaint filed by a man arrested for wearing an "Occupy Everywhere" jacket inside the Supreme Court building last fall. Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that court police officers had probable cause to... Read More »

Sentencing for Jesse Jackson Jr. Postponed

Updated at 3:30 p.m. Former U.S. congressman Jesse Jackson Jr. will have to wait a little longer to find out whether he's going to prison for misusing hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign funds. Sentencing for Jackson-scheduled to take... Read More »

Death Penalty Protesters Fasting at Supreme Court

For the 20th year in a row, a group of death penalty protesters is holding a four-day demonstration in front of the Supreme Court seeking an end to capital punishment. The protest is timed to coincide with the June 29... Read More »

SUPREME COURT CASES

United States v. Windsor

Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional as deprivation of equal liberty of persons that is protected by Fifth Amendment (Kennedy, J.) Read More »

Sekhar v. United States

Attempt to compel person to recommend his employer approve investment did not constitute "obtaining of property from another" for purposes of Hobbs Act definition of extortion (Scalia, J.) Read More »

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Proponents of California same-sex marriage law initiative lacked standing to appeal federal district court's disapproval after California governor and state and local officials refused to defend challenged law (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder

Provision in 1965 Voting Rights Act determining which states must receive federal preclearance based on past history of discrimination in voting is outdated and unconstitutional (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a claim of retaliatory adverse employment action requires proof of but-for causation, not merely proof that improper motive was one of multiple causes of the challenged employment action. (U.S. Supreme Court, 06-24-2013) Read More »

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Biological father who had never had custody of child could not rely on Indian Child Welfare Act to obtain custody after birth mother agreed to adoption of child by non-Indian adoptive couple (Alito, J.) Read More »



Careers
Position title EMPLOYER NAME LOCATION

Associate Counsel: Norfolk

Davis Search

Norfolk, Virginia

Healthcare Attorney

Atticus Recruiting Inc.

Chicago, Illinois

JAG - Judge Advocate General (Air Force Attorney)

United States Air Force

Jackson, Mississippi

POWERED BY lawjobs.com

Email Management Area

Please do not reply to the address you received this email from. Manage your email communications below.

Why you received this email message:

You are subscribed to the
NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update as reg.thakur@gmail.com.

You may be subscribed to multiple publications as part of your relationship with us.

To stop receiving this publication (unsubscribe):

To stop receiving the NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update please click here.You will be taken through an unsubscribe process. Please follow all directions regarding this process.
It may take 10-days to remove you from receiving this publication.

Note: If you are subscribed to multiple publications, per your subscription, you will need to unsubscribe from each publication you receive utilizing the email management area at the bottom of each publication.

To not receive or opt-out of email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®:

Please click here to opt-out of receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®. This will only prevent you from receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®; you will continue receiving the publications as noted above unless you unsubscribe from each one. It may take up to 10-days to remove you from receiving email marketing promotions.

How to contact us should you have questions:

The National Law Journal®
120 Broadway, 5th Floor,
New York, NY 10271-1101
Customer Service Phone: 1-877-256-2472

About ALM | Customer Support | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
   © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC.
All rights reserved.
 fb  tw

No comments:

Post a Comment