Monday, July 8, 2013

D.C. Circuit Nominee Millett Would Take a Major Pay Cut

NEwS FROM WASHINGTON

• D.C. Circuit Nominee Millett Would Take a Major Pay Cut

• Judge Won't Block Force-Feeding at Guantanamo

• Patton Boggs Receives Another Lebanese Banking Client

• Judge Keeps Alive Whistleblower Suit Against Halliburton

• Court Affirms Ruling that D.C. Water Didn't Corrode Pipes

• Securities Enforcers

D.C. Circuit Nominee Millett Would Take a Major Pay Cut

If the Senate confirms her, she would trade law firm earnings of $1 million per year, according to newly released committee records, for the $184,500 salary of a federal circuit judge. Read More »

Judge Won't Block Force-Feeding at Guantanamo

A federal trial judge in Washington today declined to force the government to stop the force-feeding of a group of detainees at the Guantánamo Bay naval facility. The judge, Gladys Kessler of U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia,... Read More »

Patton Boggs Receives Another Lebanese Banking Client

As Patton Boggs helps Lebanon's financial regulator assuage concerns in Washington about Lebanese banks' alleged money laundering for terrorists, a bank in the country has come to the firm for assistance. Beirut-based MEAB SAL, once known as the Middle East... Read More »

Judge Keeps Alive Whistleblower Suit Against Halliburton

A federal trial judge has declined to shut down a whistleblower's suit that alleges defense contractor Kellogg Brown & Root and its parent company, Halliburton Co., passed along to the U.S. government the inflated cost of laundry services provided to... Read More »

Court Affirms Ruling that D.C. Water Didn't Corrode Pipes

D.C. water has faced its share of bad press in the past, but the city recently fended off a lawsuit claiming the water was so corrosive it caused leaks in copper piping. The owner of residential apartment buildings in Northwest... Read More »

Securities Enforcers

Appointed by chairman Mary Jo White to co-direct the SEC Enforcement Division, long-time friends George Canellos and Andrew Ceresney have a formidable to-do list. They talk to NLJ about their plans for the division. Read More »

SUPREME COURT CASES

United States v. Windsor

Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional as deprivation of equal liberty of persons that is protected by Fifth Amendment (Kennedy, J.) Read More »

Sekhar v. United States

Attempt to compel person to recommend his employer approve investment did not constitute "obtaining of property from another" for purposes of Hobbs Act definition of extortion (Scalia, J.) Read More »

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Proponents of California same-sex marriage law initiative lacked standing to appeal federal district court's disapproval after California governor and state and local officials refused to defend challenged law (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder

Provision in 1965 Voting Rights Act determining which states must receive federal preclearance based on past history of discrimination in voting is outdated and unconstitutional (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a claim of retaliatory adverse employment action requires proof of but-for causation, not merely proof that improper motive was one of multiple causes of the challenged employment action. (U.S. Supreme Court, 06-24-2013) Read More »

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Biological father who had never had custody of child could not rely on Indian Child Welfare Act to obtain custody after birth mother agreed to adoption of child by non-Indian adoptive couple (Alito, J.) Read More »



Careers
Position title EMPLOYER NAME LOCATION

Real Estate / Finance Associate - Class of 2008 - 2010

Marina Sirras & Associates LLC

New York

Real Estate Associate - Class of 2007-2010

Marina Sirras & Associates LLC

Hartford, Connecticut

Substantive Project Attorney – Commercial and Securities Litigation

CYLA, a division of JuriSolutions

Washington, District of Columbia

POWERED BY lawjobs.com

Email Management Area

Please do not reply to the address you received this email from. Manage your email communications below.

Why you received this email message:

You are subscribed to the
NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update as reg.thakur@gmail.com.

You may be subscribed to multiple publications as part of your relationship with us.

To stop receiving this publication (unsubscribe):

To stop receiving the NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update please click here.You will be taken through an unsubscribe process. Please follow all directions regarding this process.
It may take 10-days to remove you from receiving this publication.

Note: If you are subscribed to multiple publications, per your subscription, you will need to unsubscribe from each publication you receive utilizing the email management area at the bottom of each publication.

To not receive or opt-out of email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®:

Please click here to opt-out of receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®. This will only prevent you from receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®; you will continue receiving the publications as noted above unless you unsubscribe from each one. It may take up to 10-days to remove you from receiving email marketing promotions.

How to contact us should you have questions:

The National Law Journal®
120 Broadway, 5th Floor,
New York, NY 10271-1101
Customer Service Phone: 1-877-256-2472

About ALM | Customer Support | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
   © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC.
All rights reserved.
 fb  tw

No comments:

Post a Comment