Wednesday, July 10, 2013

For D.C. Circuit Nominee, Credentials Are Not The Controversy

NEwS FROM WASHINGTON

• For D.C. Circuit Nominee, Credentials Are Not The Controversy

• Patton Boggs Lobbyist Joins Wilmer

• FCC Tackles Cost of Prison Phone Calls

• Katten Starts Internet Practice with Former Steptoe Partner

• Key Dodd-Frank Provision Unconstitutional, Panel Warned

• Argument That S&P's Ratings Were 'Puffery' Doesn't Fly

For D.C. Circuit Nominee, Credentials Are Not The Controversy

It was almost as if Patricia Millett didn't have to show up for her confirmation hearing Wednesday on Capitol Hill. The fight about her nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit isn't about her. There was... Read More »

Patton Boggs Lobbyist Joins Wilmer

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr is vying to expand its reach into Washington lobbying with the addition of a Patton Boggs partner. Jonathan Yarowsky joined Wilmer Wednesday as the chairman of the firm's legislative affairs and public policy practice,... Read More »

FCC Tackles Cost of Prison Phone Calls

When it comes to sky-high telephone rates, it's hard to top the cost of making a call from prison - a phone call from an inmate across town may be ten times more expensive than ringing a friend in Singapore.... Read More »

Katten Starts Internet Practice with Former Steptoe Partner

Updated 1:40 p.m. Katten Muchin Rosenman is starting an Internet practice in Washington with a lateral partner from Steptoe & Johnson LLP. Brian Winterfeldt, formerly a Steptoe intellectual property partner, joins Katten as a partner. He brings with him four... Read More »

Key Dodd-Frank Provision Unconstitutional, Panel Warned

Arguing that due process rights "are vaporized" under the Dodd-Frank Act, witnesses told a House subcommittee on Tuesday that aspects of the massive 2010 law overhauling the financial services industry might be unconstitutional. Read More »

Argument That S&P's Ratings Were 'Puffery' Doesn't Fly

A federal judge in California has said he likely would allow the U.S. Justice Department's lawsuit to go forward against ratings agency Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC over the integrity of its ratings leading up to the 2008 financial collapse. Read More »

SUPREME COURT CASES

United States v. Windsor

Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional as deprivation of equal liberty of persons that is protected by Fifth Amendment (Kennedy, J.) Read More »

Sekhar v. United States

Attempt to compel person to recommend his employer approve investment did not constitute "obtaining of property from another" for purposes of Hobbs Act definition of extortion (Scalia, J.) Read More »

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Proponents of California same-sex marriage law initiative lacked standing to appeal federal district court's disapproval after California governor and state and local officials refused to defend challenged law (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder

Provision in 1965 Voting Rights Act determining which states must receive federal preclearance based on past history of discrimination in voting is outdated and unconstitutional (Roberts, C.J.) Read More »

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar

Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a claim of retaliatory adverse employment action requires proof of but-for causation, not merely proof that improper motive was one of multiple causes of the challenged employment action. (U.S. Supreme Court, 06-24-2013) Read More »

Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl

Biological father who had never had custody of child could not rely on Indian Child Welfare Act to obtain custody after birth mother agreed to adoption of child by non-Indian adoptive couple (Alito, J.) Read More »



Careers
Position title EMPLOYER NAME LOCATION

EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION ASSOCIATE

Confidential

New York, New York

Attorney - #DBLOCK10 - Labor and Employment Associate

Hertner, Block & Bowser, Inc.

Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Litigation Associate (ERISA) 3+ Years

Finn & Associates LLC

Washington, District of Columbia

POWERED BY lawjobs.com

Email Management Area

Please do not reply to the address you received this email from. Manage your email communications below.

Why you received this email message:

You are subscribed to the
NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update as reg.thakur@gmail.com.

You may be subscribed to multiple publications as part of your relationship with us.

To stop receiving this publication (unsubscribe):

To stop receiving the NLJ Legal Times Afternoon Update please click here.You will be taken through an unsubscribe process. Please follow all directions regarding this process.
It may take 10-days to remove you from receiving this publication.

Note: If you are subscribed to multiple publications, per your subscription, you will need to unsubscribe from each publication you receive utilizing the email management area at the bottom of each publication.

To not receive or opt-out of email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®:

Please click here to opt-out of receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®. This will only prevent you from receiving email marketing promotions from the The National Law Journal®; you will continue receiving the publications as noted above unless you unsubscribe from each one. It may take up to 10-days to remove you from receiving email marketing promotions.

How to contact us should you have questions:

The National Law Journal®
120 Broadway, 5th Floor,
New York, NY 10271-1101
Customer Service Phone: 1-877-256-2472

About ALM | Customer Support | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
   © 2013 ALM Media Properties, LLC.
All rights reserved.
 fb  tw

No comments:

Post a Comment